Sunday, April 26, 2015

Week 4 Blog Assignment | MedTech + Art


Week 4 Blog Assignment | MedTech + Art


Symbol of the Hippocratic Oath
This week's material prompted me to analyze the concept of bodily pain, specifically in regards to the "untreatable" symptoms of the human condition such as chronic pain. On some level, MedTech exists to treat human pain and, with this in mind, I questioned: Why do some value the best process as treating the pain while others find the answer in escaping the pain? 

In examining Hippocrates' Oath of Medicine [Tyson], we note that the Oath represents how medicine is meant to align "for the benefit of the sick". I find the oath significant in that it asks us to recall that the reason medical technologies are invented, the root of the field's progress, is the tangible goal of alleviating ailments and improving the physical human condition, which is different than previous fields such as Math/Robotics that don't directly overlap with human physicality. 


The Curative Powers of Raw, Wet Beauty

I noticed that two different approaches have emerged to combat the reality of physical human pain in medical technology: one approach to examine the body from the inside and one from the outside. 

To expand, we can evaluate the Ted Talk on "Raw, Wet Beauty" [Gromola], where Gromala explores MedTech x Art projects like the Interactive Meatbook; explaining that it represents how our dependence on language and books has ripped us from the primordial connection to our inner senses. In her project, Gromala finds us looking outside of ourselves for understanding (represented by the book) only to be reminded that understanding can be found within ourselves (the organs/meat/senses that we are composed of composes the book). She practices this process through her treatments in VR and Meditation, which take pain and treat them through sensations [NCE]. The curative purpose of medical technology therefore becomes tied to our inner states and the sensations that relieve the pain in different capacities, even if there is no quick cure.

A Transhumanist Concept: Cybernetics
Even if there were a quick cure for chronic illnesses, the procedures would still not be able to curb a body decayed by age or death itself - other physical hindrances of the human body. This is where fields like Transhumanism burgeon: not to look inside the body for answers as Gromala, but outside of the body entirely. Transhumanists advocate the improvement of human capacities through advanced technology; technology "we don’t notice because it’s blended in with the fabric of the world" [WTA].

One manifestation of a transhumanist future can roughly be described as a future where we will live forever as digitally encrypted entities inside mechanical bodies [Willis]. Originally unfamiliar with transhumanism until this past week, I interpreted theories like this in the field as an escape from bodily limitations rather than a treatment of them- perhaps under the assumption that our bodies cannot be treated and useful forever due to aging and illness. As humanity continues to push into the future, we will continue to discover if the best practice is to really use the internal "raw, wet" components of our beings to resolve our pains, or if we really will need to be come more dependent on technological components modifying our bodies in order to thrive. 


Citations

Bostrom, Nick. "What Is Transhumanism?" Transhumanism.Org. World Transhumanist Association, n.d. Web. 26 Apr. 2015.

Gromola, Diane. "TED X AmericanRiviera - Diane Gromala - Curative Powers of Wet, Raw Beauty." YouTube. YouTube, 7 Dec. 2011. Web. 26 Apr. 2015.

Hippocratic Symbol. Digital image. Snippits and Snappits. Blogspot, 15 Mar. 2015. Web. 26 Apr. 2015.

NCE, Grand. "Confronting Pain Project Basis for New Chronic Pain Research Institute at Simon Fraser University | GRAND NCE." Grand NCE. Grand NCE, 13 Mar. 2013. Web. 26 Apr. 2015.

Shutterstock. Transhuman Upgrade. Digital image. Wired UK. Conde Nast Digital, 03 Sept. 2012. Web. 26 Apr. 2015.

Tyson, Peter. "The Hippocratic Oath Today." PBS. PBS, 27 Mar. 2001. Web. 26 Apr. 2015.

Willis, Paul. "A Transhuman Future? - Royal Institution of Australia." Royal Institution of Australia. RiAus - Australia’s Science Channel, 26 Feb. 2014. Web. 26 Apr. 2015.













1 comment:

  1. Hi Justin, interesting discussion, especially to portion where you go into transhumanism. In my opinion, there is no problem to this idea to a certain extent. Using technology help paralyzed people move again for example, should be a major medical goal. Your last example however, where some believe we could upload our consciousness and potentially live forever, is one that I feel begins to damage our humanity because mortality is a significant part of being human. The idea that we are definitely going to die has always driven human behavior and to take that away would lead to a massive shift in how we approach life.

    ReplyDelete